Taking Away Modern Technologies from Dairy Farmers Hurts the Environment
Troy L. Ott, Ph.D., PAS
Associate Professor of Reproductive Biology
Department of Dairy and Animal Science
The Pennsylvania State University
February 5, 2007
Excerpt…
Hold on to your wallets ladies and gentlemen. A number of large dairy processors are getting ready to pull the old “smoke-and-mirrors” trick that will result in you paying more for your milk while at the same time hurting the environment. “How could this be?” you say. Here’s the scam: retailers will sell “rbST-free” milk to you for a premium of about 40 cents to $2.20 per gallon. As discussed in Terry Etherton’s Blog, the milk is not different in composition from other milk, but you will have a vague feeling that it is somehow better. Never mind that rbST has been determined by the FDA to be a safe and effective way to increase milk production by 10-15%. Never mind that it has been shown to be an effective tool to increase the efficiency of dairying. Never mind that it has been approved for use for over 10 years without any documented problems. NONE!
That’s the smoke, now what about the mirrors? Well, it doesn’t take a rocket (or animal) scientist to figure out that if you take away a safe and effective tool to increase milk production by 10-15%, farmers will need to increase cow numbers to make up for the lost milk production. These cows will use more resources (grain, forage, water) and generate more waste (manure, odor, methane) and take up more space. This will increase the environmental impact of dairying in your communities. In addition, because productivity and efficiency will be reduced on many of our nations’ dairies, they will be less profitable. “What’s wrong with that, I don’t like big corporate farms.” you say. Here’s what’s wrong with that. When dairy processors force our dairies to give up using rbST, those dairies will experience a cash flow problem. What do you do when that happens at your home? You cut corners on spending. On a dairy, things like facility modernization, herd health vaccinations, cow comfort upgrades could be delayed or scrapped. Furthermore, employees’ wages will suffer as dairies scramble to reduce costs to stay in business. The dairies, their employees and the cows all suffer. Without this effective tool to increase efficiency, smaller dairies will be squeezed to either get larger or get out of the business.…
This article has been provided in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. This material is provided without profit for research and educational purposes. Prior to republication of this material in its entirety we recommend contacting the source for appropriate permissions. Alternatively, publication of an abstract with a link to the originating source page to see the full text is generally allowed.
