IGF-1, Milk and Cancer

False & Misleading Claims from the Fear Profiteers

Dairy producers concerned about losing rbST

Filed under: IGF-1 News — admin at 9:04 am on Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Capital Press
Cecilia Parsons

February 20, 2007

Exerpt…

VISALIA, Calif. - Dairy producers, concerned about consumer confidence and facing the loss of a valuable production tool, spoke out Monday and took a tentative step toward organization.

More than 100 dairy producers and people employed in the dairy industry crowded the meeting room and voiced their opinions on the marketing of rbST-free milk and the possible loss of artificial hormone as changing dairy technology.

Riverdale dairyman Doug Maddox, one of the leaders in the industry, said while he is optimistic about the future of dairying, it will take some work to stay in the business in the face of increasing environmental regulations, outrageous claims by animal rights activists and labor concerns.

“The consumer thinks they can manage our herds better than we can, it’s unbelievable,” he said.

The recent announcement by dairy cooperative California Dairies Inc., that they would ask all members to sign an affidavit saying they no longer use the Monsanto product Posilac…spurred many of the dairymen to speak out.

One of their prime concerns was that if milk marketers could convince consumers the technology was unsafe, which dairy technology would be the next target.

“It is time for farmers to be more proactive in addressing these issues,” Maddox said.

Another Riverdale dairyman, Paul Rollin, said it was time to reach out to the public.

Dr. Terry Etherton, dairy researcher and professor of animal science at Penn State University, spoke at the meeting and hit the producers with some cold, hard facts about the future of food biotechnology.

Animal rights activists have a business agenda, he said, and they collect donations and spend millions to scare the public.He said the reality is that America has the world’s safest food supply. Etherton also pointed out that what activists say is not what the majority of consumers are saying about their food.


This article has been provided in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. This material is provided without profit for research and educational purposes. Prior to republication of this material in its entirety we recommend contacting the source for appropriate permissions. Alternatively, publication of an abstract with a link to the originating source page to see the full text is generally allowed.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Reddit
  • DZone
  • Technorati

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.